Editorial Policies
Peer Review Process
All submissions are initially assessed by an Editor, who decides whether or not the article fits the scope of the journal and is suitable for peer review. Submissions considered suitable are assigned to one or more independent experts, who assess the article for clarity, validity, and sound methodology.
The journal operates a double-blind peer review process, meaning that authors and reviewers remain anonymous for the review process. The review period is expected to take around three to four weeks. Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.
Based on the reviewer reports the editorial board will make a recommendation for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance.
Section Policies
Article
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Book Review
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Themed Section Commentaries
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Multimedia and Artwork
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Letter from the Editors
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Themed Section Highlight
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed